ONLINE EXTRA: Close Up: Leonard Sweet |
![]() |
Written by Leslie Santamaria |
Tuesday, 04 February 2014 10:23 AM America/New_York |
Why do we as Christians fall so easily into the mind-set that the harder we work, the more God is pleased with us? What the Reformers called “works righteousness” is heavy with us. We are constantly throwing our rightness and righteousness on the scales rather than relying on God’s free gift of grace. We want a plan to work on, rather than the improv of play, because we prefer control to trust. What if the Holy Spirit leads us where we do not wish to go? Yet that is precisely a test of whether or not we’re living in the stream of the Spirit. If we’re only going in directions we wish to go, then who is in charge of our lives? There is another reason why we would rather “work at it” than “play it out.” Metaphor is the mother, not the maid, of thought. And our metaphors of “following Jesus” need reframing. For example, biblical faith is less about following footsteps than filling feet and walking in shoes. To follow in someone’s footsteps is work. To fill someone’s feet, or walk a mile in someone’s shoes, is play. Are a play ethic and a work ethic ever compatible? When a coach says that a member of the team “came to play,” it’s the highest compliment that can be given. And it means that the athlete is giving his best and using his powers to the max. To “play” a sport or an instrument, or to “play” at life, is to live life full throttle. How has living a well-played life been a challenge and a blessing for you? I was brought up with an acute case of the Protestant work ethic, with its requisite deferred gratifications. To move from a work paradigm to a play paradigm has been one of the greatest journeys of my life, and has led to a lightness of being that I hope to never lose. In putting Godplay into practice, I have discovered William Wordsworth to be right. In the work of getting and spending, we lay waste our powers. In the play of giving and creating, we shepherd, share and replenish our powers. How is the discussion
guide in your book designed? |